It’s interesting to reflect on this Stephen’s Groups versus Networks
How far does it reflect the reality?
Let me reflect on what happens inside and outside organisation.
Group (Myths or Reality?)
- more successful inside organisation, but not necessarily outside organisation – why? Inside an organisation, people are to follow the vision and mission statement, adopt the strategies and act on strategic plans, work as a team, and innovate and improve also within the team boundary, with goals and projects. The organisation would value team work and collaboration amongst teams. However, there is always the danger of group think in a group or team.
Networks (Myths or Reality?)
- more successful outside organisation, with other networkers, but not necessarily inside organisation – why? Outside an organisation, networkers could explore their “dreams” with people of different backgrounds, fields and expertise, especially with others who might have a common interests or a diverse fields of interests. Networkers could exercise full autonomy without constraints, or they could join or leave different networks at any time, or be connected with any one and with more openness due to relatively low conflicts of interests (as compared with those working colleagues, superiors etc.). So connectivity may be more highly valued than that in groups inside organisation.
This is the network that I perceived:
This is the group that I perceived:
This is how I perceive myself as an individual (to stay with the group and or network):
How about you?





Pingback: CCK09 Relationship of brain to groups and networks « Suifaijohnmak’s Weblog