#PLENK2010 Research on MOOC & PLENK

Based on blog posted so far:including this one by Nicola

Some of the emerging themes include:

Time and information management:  Some participants found it ok in managing their time in the course whilst others often found it hard, due to personal reasons and often feelings of overwhelming amount of information to be covered, and didn’t feel comfortable in the “selection” and filtering of resources or artifacts.  Facilitators did attempt to “intervene” or instruct by convincing or influencing participants the importance of focus and clustering. Also, a “survey” type of collective inquiry was initiated in the forum to gain a deeper understanding of the major challenges and issues in such management of time AND learning in the course PLENK.

Connections: Participants often wondered how their voices would be heard in such a MOOC PLENK, whether it be in the blogs and or forums.  Stephen responded with explanation on how to be heard. Often there seemed to be a lack of responses or comments even after the participants have made repeated attempts and extra efforts in trying to connect through their blogs or posting in forums.  The trend in the forums did show a decrease in the number of postings, whereas the number of blog postings did show some increase throughout the past weeks.  The facilitators did attempt to convince and influence the participants to move the discussion to blogs, so as to reduce the impact of overwhelming of information or “information overload due to discussion in the forum”.  Some discussion on having concise posting was raised, but there were some divided opinions in the forums.  Some connections in the forum seem to have focussed on more in-depth discussion of the pedagogical aspects of PLE/N, that could foster conceptual connections.  However, the connections were again rather diverse and “weak” and that left with some evidences of critical thinking and evaluation.  More evidences of research support may be necessary to substantiate those claims.  The facilitators (Rita in particular) did attempt to cultivate the connections through more facilitation with research findings, coupled with personal insights.  This reinforces some of the more emergent concepts arising from the MOOC – (a) learner autonomy, (b) power issues, and (c) critical literacies.  Besides, the notion of openness in MOOC (PLENK) were raised by various bloggers Jenny Mackness, David Wiley, Stephen Downes, George Siemens, Dave Cormier, Rita Kop, and participants, which all relate to how openness would have impacted on the social/personal connections that would be made, the implications arising from the use of Open education resources (OER) or open resources would have influenced education and the associated connections (i.e. how people connect with artifacts (is it freely and openly, or people have to pay or subscribe to access the resources), and the connections with facilitators, other participants through tagging, curating etc.

Personal Learning – This relates back to how individuals learn in PLENK.  At this stage of the course, many participants still thought that they might have managed their learning to certain extent, through the use of PLE (as tools, platforms of learning, and certain connections with facilitators, some other participants, and artifacts through the LMS (forums), Daily, Elluminate, and Twitter etc.  However, it seems that many participants are still not yet able to fully connect with others as “clusters”, or groups as yet, as reported by various bloggers and forum posters.  May be this is a plateau period of interaction, where participants are spending more time in reflecting on what they have learnt so far (as shared by Jenny here), and are more hesitant in further connections unless they perceive further values added to their learning with posting in forums, in particular.  There is also a plausible explanation: some participants who have learnt about critical thinking would like to practise the critical thinking as a personal development process.  As critical thinkers, such participants would likely withhold judgment, think more critically by analysing information, evaluating evidences and making judgment more cautiously, before expressing their views or comments in forums or blogs.  Such reflective thinking also means a higher level of personal learning with cognitions and thus may be a demonstration of critical literacy as espoused by Stephen Downes (refer to elements of critical literacy: syntax, semantics, pragmatics, context, change and cognition).  George also highlights the importance of critical literacies here and managing information in learning through PLENK.  Further evidences are required from this research to substantiate such claims on personal learning and critical literacies capacity development.

Power and influence: The power and influence exercised by the facilitators and participants has been nuanced, but have surfaced in the forum postings in numerous settings, where certain opinions or beliefs have been challenged by both facilitators and participants in exchange, and in blog postings, here facilitators tried to convince participants the primacy of connections and importance of managing chaos, filtering or selection of information, curating of information,  and the tolerance needed in face of ambiguity, chaos, complexity and abundance of information.  There have been warm welcome of such instructions and influence by some participants, as evidenced in the Elluminate and blog postings.

Initial analysis by George did show the trend of postings and the emergent nature of the course, in terms of course design, delivery and connections. Refer to this Siemens, G. Learning in Open Courses

http://www.slideshare.net/gsiemens/teaching-learning-in-open-courses

Downes, S. A world to change

More learning analytics and further research findings are required to substantiate such claims.

#PLENK 2010 Reflection on MOOC experiments

My response to Chris Life under microscope
I could understand how it feels when “PLENKers are lab rats running the maze of a completely unstructured learning experience so that the people in white coats can observe us and form theories about how lab rats learn so that they might build the personal learning environment of the future.”

Photos: from Flickr

 

First, I had been with Jenny throughout the journey in CCK08, and also experienced quite a lot on such learning environment with many others like Ken in the CCK courses. I could sense that you, like many others won’t feel comfortable with that role. That’s also why I have volunteered to conduct action research this time, rather than being just a participant, in order to gain a deeper understanding of MOOC/PLENK from different perspectives. I reckon if it is researched and learned with that in mind, then it will be more about “youself or myself” learning in the course, and how your way of learning would be influenced by the connections under such an ecology (course), rather than teaching and learning strategies in a typical formal course, which normally would be about “us (students) and them (instructors)” Without such experiment/experience, how would we be confident in “trying it out” with our students? Would it work for your students? If you use the plenk (MOOC) approach, why would your students bail out? What would you recommend instead? I love to hear.

Photo: From PLENK blog
Is this MOOC about teaching? In previous MOOC, there were many teachers joining the course, expecting to learn about “teaching strategies” in MOOC. No, CCK was about learning, and so is PLENK. That’s why you may have to justify your teaching methods (as you said), as this is about learning, not “teaching”….

Photo: From Flickr

The social ecology

We need to have a humorous side of PLENK?

John

#PLENK2010 Assessment and Evaluation

I just managed to watch & listen to Elluminate Recording of Wednesday. I read Jenny’s post on evaluation and assessment, and would like to respond and reflect on it.

For me, assessment is relating to a collection of evidence which could be in form of portfolios, blogs & blog posts, forum postings, twitter postings, action projects, videos, podcasts, wikis, research projects, research papers, artifacts, etc. or in typical classroom/workplace learning – assignments, tests, examination, observation, questioning, tasks, projects, assessment activities etc.

Evaluation, however could be relating more to a product, service or process. Evaluation of a product or process – like an evaluation of the assessment tasks, courses, curriculum, through surveys, reviews, discourse, and in the case of PLENK, it could mean the evaluation of tools against set criteria by the learners, or the community in their effectiveness in achieving the learning goals set. Evaluation of support or service  could include that of evaluating the facilitation, teaching, moderation, and evaluation of the supporting service or tools could include that of evaluating the LMS, Moodle, RSS, Facebook, Twitter, blogging providers, wikis providers, connections, aggregators, ICT support etc.

So, evaluation of the effectiveness of the tools, service and support is quite different from the assessment of the learners (which is based on the collection of evidence).

We could recognize ones previous learning (i.e. recognition of prior learning) based on assessment – collection of evidence that prove ones achievement of the learning outcomes, and meeting of performance criteria as stipulated in the units of competency.

We could evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the recognition and or assessment process based on certain evaluation criteria – such as the auditing of the assessment process (based on checklists, how evidences are collected, how judgment is arrived, the appeal process, etc.), assessment validation meetings (between assessors), and the overall assessment reviews.

In the case of PLENK, the evaluation process could include whether the assessment process (for instance certain assessment tasks which relate to the creation of blogs and setting up of blog posts by participants, the comments made, the participation in blogs discussion, the participation in various media etc. as set forth or negotiated by participants, and the action learning and reflection which are evidenced in the blog posts.  These could also relate to the critical literacies which include syntax, semantics, pragmatic, and critical thinking as revealed in blog posts) have been achieved as “planned” either by the facilitators or by the participants, and that may take the form of a combination of self and or peer evaluation of the assessment process, and the review of the effectiveness of such learning tools in learning.

John