#Change11 #CCK12 What if the models are right?

In this All models are wrong Keith sets the tone and proposes that all models are wrong and some are useful.

Here are the slides referred to:

Are models right or wrong?  I think models are just forms of representation that may metaphorically represent what work under a certain context, based on certain interactions in the teaching and learning environment, and findings from empirical research or theoretical hypothesis.  Sometimes, these models could rightly describe the state of the art of learning in a particular situation, but would be hard to generalize in other scenarios, when time changes and new information and technology emerges.  What may be a useful and helpful model would always relate to active, engaging learning.

Active learning, is generally defined as any instructional method that engages students in the learning process.  For instance, collaborative learning, cooperative learning, problem based learning are all useful means to achieve the learning goals, in particular in group learning in schools. The core elements of active learning is the introduction of activities into the traditional lecture and the promotion of student engagement.  Learning, could be centered around engagement and connections under an active learning paradigm.  Is such learning described, analysed, and explained under a Theory of Learning or a Theory of Teaching?  These might have been researched, and the principles coined under both behavioral-cognitivist in classroom learning, and constructivism in group and networked learning in school and community setting.  However, it is based on a Theory of Teaching, where pedagogy is emphasised.

As Stephen mentions in his conversation here Connectivism is a Theory of Learning NOT that of teaching. I have conceived that in my learner blog here.   Based on Stephen’s discussion here on social media, I am reflecting on why Connectivism and MOOC are more likely be based on social media, where learning is the construction and navigation of distributed knowledge (pattern and its recognition) over networks.  Does it explain why teachers and educators who are trained and educated under Constructivism and Social Constructivism would view  Connectivism as counter-intuitive?  Educators are LOOKING FOR an education and learning theory that could be applied in the classroom, but it seems that this learning theory is focused on the LEARNERS in the networks, and in particular the social networks, which are outside schools, classrooms, and the formal education closed walled environment.

I have argued in my previous posts here and here on Connectivism versus Constructivism.  It seems the meaning making as defined in Constructivism (as knowledge representation) is not the same as the meaning as defined under Connectivism where knowledge is pattern recognition and is based on experience and action, with growth of knowledge as the ultimate goal in mind.  Also, under Connectivism, such knowledge could reside outside the mind, rather than just in the minds of people (under a Cognitivist approach).

So, are there right or wrong models of learning?  I think there are only models which would more readily explain certain forms of learning.  In the case of informal learning, such as social learning, then Connectivism would be a useful  learning model that could mimic the learning that occurs in the networks.  However, it could also explain how such learning is translated and “inducted” in individuals, where the growth of networks (as plasticity of brain) within one’s brain would also signify the growth of knowledge and capacity of learning.

Image: Google picture

About these ads

4 thoughts on “#Change11 #CCK12 What if the models are right?

  1. Dear colleague, The thousand things are too many to fit in a model. So the model could be beautiful like a bon-sai (pen jing I must say) but like a pen jing is not a common tree, so a model is not the thousand things. But we could enjoy the beauty of a pen jing. We could look at it and our thoughts will follow the ways of the wise men.
    Could we regard a theory as a kind of model?
    Like your image, images are like pen jing, they can give us food for thinking.
    Regards Jaap

  2. Hi Jaap,
    A learning theory is a modelling of the learning, and in the case of Connectivism – Networked learning which focuses on learning as making connections http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_theory_(education). This is based on the epistemology of Connectionism, Complexity Theory, Self-Organising Theory, and the Theory of Emergence. So, as George as once mentioned, thinking and looking at the networks as a whole may not be helpful, but thinking of individual connections in order to explain why and how learning has occurred may be easier for us to understand – and that learning starts and develops with connections – where knowledge grows, with different sorts of learning such as connective, emergent learning. To this end, sense-making and way finding would be the valuable tools while constructing and navigating networks. Stephen’s emphasis on pattern recognition, with growth of knowledge based on connections of entities does provide a holistic model that embodies every scenarios in learning, with diversity, autonomy, openness and connectivity being the properties of such networks. Learning to me could both be natural and artificially constructed and conceived, depending on what sort of frame of reference (model) or framework, system you use.
    A shift of reference framework could reveal a different model. In the past, we might have fixated on one model, and not aware of the existence of different models which are equally valuable in mapping into the reality. Following a wise man or woman could be wise. Everyone has however our wisdom – that maps our model of the world, based on experience and knowledge. As a Catholic, I still believe the wisdom comes from our God, Jesus Christ our Lord, who is the wisest.
    John

  3. Pingback: #Change11 #Change12 A summary of reflection on Theory of Learning – Connectivism | Learner Weblog

  4. Pingback: #Change11 #CCK12 What if the models are right? | Learner Weblog | Connectivism | Scoop.it

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s