This is my response to Lisa’s post Control by Personality http://lisahistory.wordpress.com/
I read the post with great interest.
“It seems to be the perception of power that is important”… “As with all effective aspects of learning, personality may be another overlooked element…”I echoed with your view and insights.
As a teacher myself, I had never taken drastic actions without first consulting my learners (all adult learners). I realised that a teacher’s integrity lies with “one’s walking the talk”. So unfortunately, the spirit of networking has been greatly affected, and I don’t think that’s conducive to learning, especially for adult learners and teachers. My comment is based on an incident, rather than based on a person. And as I am not a learner looking for credits, I didn’t want my comments to affect others’ grading. And I realise how upset people (co-learners and lurkers) are.
However, I think this is a revelation that a teacher’s “great knowledge and power” doesn’t come from inside of that person, but from outside. And I learnt that respect can only be earned if a teacher is truly “compassionate, empathetic and knowledgeable to and engaging WITH the learners or teachers – peers”. May be that’s the missing element in connectivism?? Is it?
No one likes to learn without emotions or feelings, otherwise we will become the computers, which could be switched on or off by others. And I do not believe that computer can “learn” as much as human do, and as smart as human too.
Do you think you and your students share such feelings or emotions towards power? Is it the reason why connectivism is so “hard” to stay alive if people are just “connecting” without feelings? Or are people really connected? I have seen such happenings often in organisations, and the result is…I would NOT be bent with power…., though anyone could play with it. But it is like playing with fire. It hurts.
Thanks for your inspiring post.
You are welcome to comment on my blog https://suifaijohnmak.wordpress.com