In this post
A powerful global conversation has begun. Through the Internet, people are discovering and inventing new ways to share relevant knowledge with blinding speed. As a direct result, markets are getting smarter—and getting smarter faster than most companies.
What are the implications of such global conversation, especially on our personal learning and our organisation or institution learning?
I have just tried the Type Analyser and found this:
Enter a blog
The writing style reflects the persona used by the blogger.
New: what archetype is that blogger? and the secret agenda behind this research!
The analysis indicates that the author of
is of the type:
INFJ – The Protectors
The thoughtfully creative and empathetic type. They are especially attuned to thinking up new and better ways of helping people get their needs met. They can be fiercely independent and can work tirelessly to achieve their goals. They often need a friendly reminder not to take themselves too seriously and enjoy the process as well as the achievement.
They like working in an environment where they can set goals and help people grow. Since they often are so good listeners and have strong integrity they often end up very appreciated leaders.
Is it me? You are the judge!
Thanks Jenny’s Researching in a Team, you mentioned yourself as a Thinker. Have I made the right guess?
Thanks also to X28’s reference.
This sort of games using technology are just amazing. I just wonder how they did it? Are there any one who knows how it works? Who could crack their secrets?
Let me guess: when I tried the MBTI (Myers Briggs Type Indicators) you need to pick the key words and then you could be identified with a particular style. I think this software is doing a similar job by checking the number of times those key words appearing on your blog posts and your own comments. This will then deduce the style based on the frequency of words that appear to match for a particular style. Another trick is to check the number of links included in the blog posts. The more links there are, the greater is the possibility of a Scientist (who used to link up all resources). The thinker are more inclined to raise questions, so by checking the number of questions (or qustions marks), one could identify those thinkers. As for the protectors, the search of words like imagination, goals, needs and the counting of number of comments left in one’s blog could be another way of identifying them.
Am I right? Would you please tell me?