Allison Miller posted in facebook: if content is an exchange of knowledge does it really matter about ‘quality’ or about how the content is used in context? #converge09
Are we referring to the “accuracy” or “validity” of the information or facts or the “truthfulness” of the “knowledge”?
What may be true knowledge today may not be true tomorrow – the hoax that people made up in the news is a typical example. The truth of such knowledge might be revealed upon examination, and validation, but even then, is it easy to know the “truth”? So would it depend on the type of knowledge? Is it content knowledge? Procedural knowledge? Quantitative knowledge? Qualitative knowledge? Connective knowledge? Emergent knowledge?….Sometimes, knowledge could be really perceptional and interpretative, which may carry different meaning to different people under different context. Like what we are sharing here. How does this sound to you?
How about this video on knowledge?