Connective “knowledge” is not a “thing”, it could be sensed, recognised (as patterns) by individuals, but might be interpreted or perceived differently under different contexts/digital media by each of us. It might be new and tacit knowledge, and so might not be “transferred” as a thing, but could emerge and be understood upon communication, engagement and interaction – which relates to our capacity to navigate and immerge in the networks – learning and thinking with reflection in action with Personal Learning Network (PLN).
How about your interpretation of knowledge?