CCK11 Learner Autonomy

Great list of the characteristics of an autonomous learner by Jenny here. I may have to dig deeper into our research findings to reflect some of those listed. Would some of them be interwoven with each others? Being proactive would also be showing initiative, and that may be related to intrinsic motivation (plus extrinsic motivation) etc. So, would a concept map linking of these attributes (with some cause and effect) help? Autonomy could also be based on personal taste, which could be translated and interpreted differently when one takes up a particular role. For a learner who is also an educator, being autonomous in learning could be in conflict with the autonomy in teaching, as wearing a teaching hat does assume certain responsibility that is beyond a typical learner would embrace.

This David Little’s paper on Learner Autonomy

Holec began by defining learner autonomy as the “ability to take charge of one’s own learning”, noting that this ability “is not inborn but must be acquired either by ‘natural’ means or (as most often happens) by formal learning.

Implications of this definition of learner autonomy

We take our first step towards developing the ability to take charge of our own learning when we accept full responsibility for the learning process, acknowledging that success in learning depends crucially on ourselves rather than on other people. This acceptance of responsibility entails that we set out to learn, “in a systematic, deliberate way” (Holec 1981, p.3), the skills of reflection and analysis that enable us to plan, monitor and evaluate our learning.

So, there are lots of assumptions here, where responsibility could be one of the keys for learner autonomy – so the learner could take charge of learning.  Would this also require an understanding of the skills necessary to determine what a successful learning means?  This may relate to the goals and plan set by the learner in order to achieve personal learning.  Are the goals set by the learners in alignment with the education in a school or HE setting?

In What is Learner Autonomy and How Can It Be Fostered?  Dimitrios Thanasoulas explains that:

On a general note, the term autonomy has come to be used in at least five ways (see Benson & Voller, 1997: 2):

  • for situations in which learners study entirely on their own;
  • for a set of skills which can be learned and applied in self-directed learning;
  • for an inborn capacity which is suppressed by institutional education;
  • for the exercise of learners’ responsibility for their own learning;
  • for the right of learners to determine the direction of their own learning.

It is noteworthy that autonomy can be thought of in terms of a departure from education as a social process, as well as in terms of redistribution of power attending the construction of knowledge and the roles of the participants in the learning process.

So, I think learning with learner autonomy could be quite distinct from the formal education pathway where educational goals are normally pre-set by the institutions rather than the learners.  Would learner autonomy be more relevant for more independent and self-directed learners who are seeking alternative learning pathways, especially when such learners are learning through social media or learning networks which are not directly linked to educational institutions?

To be continued.

5 thoughts on “CCK11 Learner Autonomy

  1. Hi John,
    If you were to draw on your own personal, professional, and sociocultural background, what characteristics would you list? What enables you to be both an autonomous learner and also a connector within the network?

  2. Hi Mary,
    Many thanks for your great questions.
    As today is THE NEW YEAR of the Rabbit, I would like to say HAPPY NEW YEAR to you.
    Would come back to respond to you later, as I would like to think about those points more thoroughly.
    How about you?
    John

  3. Even though I wouldn’t call myself an autonomous learner, I think that other people would categorize me as one. The one thing that comes up (often) when people refer to autonomous learners is that they just go an learn, seek out their own resources and sources and they’re (often) better off because they can avoid the “boring” stuff that they already know if they are taking a structured course.

    While there is a possibility that learners might already know a topic (or have some familiarity with the topic) if they are in a structured course that happens to cover this familiar topic, there is also a possibility that an autonomous learner will learn something that wasn’t even on his/her radar. Autonomous learners do have blind-spots (we all do!) the benefit of having some structure is that someone a little more familiar with the overall picture can help guide us through materials that we didn’t even know existed.

    I think a semi-structured environment is the best learning environment because you have the benefit of someone more familiar with the overall picture that can recommend materials that should fill in areas that you have gaps in, but at the same time the onus is the learner to learn and apply what they’ve learned, and extend what they learn into other areas of their knowledge domain.

  4. Pingback: #EduMOOC Openness | Learner Weblog

  5. Pingback: #Change11 #CCK12 Application of Connectivism | Learner Weblog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s