Interesting to learn about the xMOOCs as reported by Mure on edX president predicts an online learning transformation – as evisioned by Professor Agnant Agarwal.
This is what we have found in “our” research: The research highlighted a difference between men and women in terms of their communication styles and preferences. Women tended to look for similarities or commonalities (i.e., in issues of language) that could become a source of bonding. In contrast, some men had a tendency to practice one-upmanship, in the sense of trying to keep one step ahead of other participants as competitors. Men were more task-oriented in their use of language, while women put more emphasis on socioemotional dimensions. (Kop, Fournier & Mak, 2011)
As Mary suggested: “Hard on problem, soft on people”.
There are now so many “opinion” & “marketing” pieces in media that many of us (including me) seem to be prophesizing with or without much evidences. There are certain truths embedded in each claim : technology surely would enhance education and learning.
My questions are:
1. “How do we know we could transform the world of education with online education?”
2. “What is the theory behind such prediction?”
3. “Is the theory of disruptive innovation as proposed by Clayton Christensen predicting what we are experiencing?”
4. “Who have influenced the MOOC movement?”
Whilst I would anticipate that there would be a diversity of opinions on the above questions, I could only explain that we are now likely influenced by the “opinion pieces” in the major media, where the “super-star” professors and those in power in the media would likely be able to “convince” us well beforehand what would be a transformation of education.
Did we predict that in 2008?
I have great respects on many of the pioneers in xMOOCs – Agnant Agarwal, Andrew Ng, Daphne Koller, so please take these as questions, not as a way to dilute their assertions.
I also believe that men are more task – oriented, in that males are more than happy to “forge” their views and opinions than women. Take a look at most of the news and media posts in most Higher Ed.. How many strong opinion pieces are written by males compared to females? Male bloggers tend to include lots of evidences (despite that they are all re-mixed, re-purposed views and opinions) in their posts, but they are practically having the same message – a proponent or opponent of MOOCs. On the other hand, female authors and bloggers are generally more careful in crafting their views and sharing them in blogs or major media. They tend to hit the soioemotional dimensions, with a light touch on people, but great in rhetorical presentations.
I know this may be overly generalized, but it seems to be reflective of reality, as I have observed that in the decades of teaching and learning, and that throughout the MOOCs since 2008. What do you think?