What is Higher Education bubble?
Colleges used to worry about the character and moral fiber of their students, and so they had a lot of in loco parentis social regulations and demerits and so forth. Now they worry that students aren’t happy or too stressed or lonely or short on self-esteem. Colleges are paranoid about retention—that if the consumers aren’t happy they’ll just choose another brand of college.
Aren’t these the concerns of many colleges nowadays? Here George comments:
The students were happy: Who complains about courses with high grades but little work? The professors were happy, and the administrators were happy because students getting good grades typically don’t gripe or, more important, drop out. But courses in which students just go through the motions without learning anything are a waste of time and money.
I think this is one of the concerns of administrators, educators and learners, especially when education is evaluated and measured against “customer – or learners’ satisfaction”, via the surveys, with the “happy faces” rather than the added value of learning, from an educational and learning point of view. Aren’t we at the cross road of trying to satisfying the learners’ needs and expectation, together with the compliance to standards set by institutions, industry, business and education authorities. Whose needs are most important? What are some of the issues of Higher Education bubble and Higher education? Standardization?
A focus on standardization narrows the curriculum and creates a teaching culture where creativity, exploration, and critical thinking are scarce or non-existent. It creates a culture that students do not want to be a part of and one that can only be sustained with the use of “if-then” rewards or “carrots and sticks.” Is this the direction we want to go? Do we want schools to squash creativity and reinforce a model that worked well in the 20th century but will not prepare our students for their future?
How could we solve these problems? We should create a teaching culture where creativity and creative and critical thinking is encouraged and supported. This would also create a culture that students would like to be part of, rather than being forced to attend, under the tyranny. In this connection, would Higher Education Bubble be solved by the MOOCs (see here on MOOCs too)? Here George thinks that MOOCs are really a platform. I think MOOCs could both be a platform and a springboard (despite an experimental one) in fulfilling the educational needs of global learners. In the c MOOCs, as Stephen says: it is the learners who decide what success means, in terms of their achievement of personal goals.
So not only do they not depend on us for learning, but also, their learning is not subject to our value-judgements and prejudices. We (those of working in MOOCs) have also been clear about the influences of people like Ivan Illich and Paulo Freire. And it’s not just about ‘flipping’ courses. It’s about reducing and eventually eliminating the learned dependence on the expert and the elite – not as a celebration of anti-intellectualism, but as a result of widespread and equitable access to expertise.
To me, that is also the ideology of post-modernist and post-traditionist education, where learner independence and inter-dependence would not be judged merely from the traditional educational teaching in schools.
Postscript: Refer to this post on Higher Education Bubble.