In this post on MOOCs, Ms Koller says that the winner takes all.
Mr Koller said that, although there were currently many competitors in the MOOC market, she thought it would tend toward being winner take all.
“Right now, we’re four times larger than anybody else in terms of students, 10 times larger than anybody else in terms of courses,” she said.
“So I think we are well positioned to be that platform that will enable everyone to learn.”
I think we are now witnessing a game of competition among MOOC players, where I once commented that
As I have shared, we are now in the Lord of the Ring game, where those who win takes all. Education is now a game, not as much as the once enlightenment or passion sort of education vision, but a pragmatic sort of education of whether one could get a job after taking a course of study, or getting famous through “educating” others in MOOCs. It is the media that would likely determine who is the winner, not the test anymore, as no one could objectively test or examine what is really “competent” or “capable” under those framework, mainly because they are producer driven, not user driven.
Though I am a strong supporter of MOOCs throughout the years, I still have many questions relating to the sustainability when MOOCs are totally free. I am for free open education, and I have thought about the implication of freebies with education. This could be a pathway with no return though we keep “promising” education could be delivered free to a global audience.
What I found challenging is education has turned into edutainment on one hand, by trying to keep education interesting and engaging (that is quick fix and learn of certain vocational skills, or mere basic concepts), whilst education has been turned into a commodity for selling the brand, with a teach, tell and assess mentality, without thoroughly thinking about what the learners have actually learnt and thought about their learning, and their relevance to their work or lives. To what extent have we really prepared our learners to learn and confront the challenges that they are facing in this 21st century?
Yes, we have the best education in the world teaching us. The question is: Have we got the best learning yet?
I won’t repeat what I said here, and so you could refer to my previous posts relating to the differences between x and c MOOCs.
I hope Coursera would be equally successful in winning in this game of MOOCs, though edX and Udacity would surely like to share that big win in these few years.
Let’s see if there are other cMOOCs contenders who would challenge the winners of this game of MOOCs.
Wasn’t the cMOOCs the first winner after all? I reckon they were, at least in creating the big name for others to follow suit.
Pingback: Will the winner take all in MOOCs? | e-learning...
Pingback: Will the winner take all in MOOCs? | Educaci&oa...
Pingback: MOOC | Annotary
Pingback: Will the winner take all in MOOCs? | Inform&aac...
Pingback: Will the winner take all in MOOCs? « Analyzing Educational Technology